Granted, places like Oakland and NYC have very specific challenges to meet such as the protection of public safety and the insurance of public hygiene. I am positive that there are some very well-intentioned people in the Oakland and NY City Governments.
State violence to silence dissent, however, is a patent violation of what America is said to be. These basic principles of the protection of political speech, freedom of assembly, the protection of basic human rights and bans against state monopolies on violence are what made the United States a progressive nation in 1776.
Unfortunately, this has never stopped federal, state and local governments from violently quashing public movements to attain such frivolities and equal education for minorities, fair wages and the right to unionize, freedom from environmental degradation and threats to human health, the rights of indigenous peoples, the rights of immigrants to be free of exploitation, world freedom from the economic hegemony of the US through the WTO, and, most recently, domestic freedom from a self-interested economic system that rewards Wall Street elites at the expense of everyone else.
Last night, I watched “This is What Democracy Looks Like,” a collection of footage from the 1999 WTO Protests in Seatlle, which turned into something about more than just the WTO. I would recommend that city officials (and everyone else) watch this film, particularly those who malign the Occupy movements. Though the fallout from this massive event was short lived and largely forgotten, it’s clear that the entire scenario is being repeated all over the United States in 2011.
When I first went to Malawi, I didn’t know better. Honestly, the guards’ constant requests for money annoyed me. Taking a step back and considering the reprehensible conditions under which these men must work, and questioning whether these conditions would in any way be tolerated in the US, I can only come out against exploitative, first world companies like G4S. Apologistic arguments that all Malawians are treated this badly and thus nothing should be done are weak and unforgivable for those working in any humanitarian capacity.
Moral of the story: Tip your guards at least a months wage for every month you’re there. If one of them asks you for money, he might well need it because his meager wages aren’t sufficient to pay his kids’ school fees or, worse yet, buy food.
The nature of African inequality will not change overnight, but small actions can make a huge difference. Remember, one of those guys may take a blade for you one day.
The fact-finding team found serious and ongoing violations of labour laws concerning overtime and time off as well as behaviour that have consigned workers to a hand-to-mouth existence.
Allowing racist behaviour to go unchecked
• “Kaffirs” and “Monkeys” Workers allege that G4S supervisors refer to guards
at the Johannesburg airport as “kaffirs” and “monkeys.” SATAWU, the union
representing guards at the airport, had to petition for their removal. The company took no corrective action of its own.
• “Whites Only” Toilets According to SATAWU, a G4S manager in Pretoria provides white guards with keys to the company toilet. Black guards are forced to use the toilet in a nearby mall.
Maintaining policies that keep guards in poverty
• In Blantyre, Malawi, guards’ salaries are so low they are forced to live in some
of the area’s poorest housing—homes with no running water and no electricity. Guards said their families frequently don’t have enough to eat and their children’s school fees go unpaid. Tea, in a country where tea plantations dot the land, was considered by the wife of one G4S guard to be an unobtainable luxury item. Guards in Malawi could earn more because they work enormous
amounts of overtime. Instead of increasing their hourly pay for the four hours of overtime they typically work each day, Group 4 Securicor reduces their wages by half.
• In both Malawi and Mozambique, guards report they are not allowed to take paid leave. One guard from Blantyre, Malawi, reported that he had worked an entire year with only a single paid day off. He was allowed the day off to attend a funeral.